Thứ Tư, 6 tháng 7, 2005

Anatomy of a Hack


Protect Your Windows Network : From Perimeter to Data (Microsoft Technology) by Jesper M. Johansson, Steve RileyThe folks at InformIT -- actually authors Steve Riley and Jesper Johansson -- have excerpted a chapter of their security book entitled, "Protect Your Windows Network: From Perimeter to Data". The chapter is an interesting discussion of the pros and cons of penetration testing. In it, they discuss the anatomy of a "typical" hacking attempt and how how black-hats take advantage of typical configuration errors. Their intent? Education in order to protect networks by omitting the most common mistakes.

InformIT: Anatomy of a Hack - Rise and Fall of your Network

Thứ Hai, 4 tháng 7, 2005

Blog Worms


Picture credit: http://securityawareness.blogspot.com
Excel web sharing - spreadsheet collaboration over the Internet made easy with BadBlueThe incredible popularity of the PHP web application language has an obvious downside: if a significant vulnerability is discovered, it will take a while to patch all of the relevant systems. Netcraft reported today that just such a weakness has been discovered: the XML-RPC libraries (conventional and PEAR) allow remote execution of PHP code via a failed escapement of quotes. Popular applications such as PostNuke, WordPress and Drupal are vulnerable.

Such an exploit combined with Santy-style installation techniques (i.e., it uses Google to search for potential victims) could wreak havoc on thousands of servers.

Netcraft: PHP Blogging Apps Vulnerable to XML-RPC Exploits

Report: unrest in China a sign of democracy


Picture credit: http://www.sojo.net
Excel web sharing - spreadsheet collaboration over the Internet made easy with BadBlueHong Kong newspapers are reporting that growing civil unrest in rural areas of China may signal public awareness of democratic rights. Reports in the South China Morning Post indicate that thousands of farmers surrounded a police station in Sanshangang township over the weekend. The farmers demanded the release of arrestees who had protested the government's recent land grabs.

Thank goodness for the speeches of Ted Kennedy and Howard Dean, which are certain to have inspired freedom-seekers all over the world.

A senior Chinese official said increasing unrest in rural China was the result of growing public awareness about democratic rights, a Hong Kong newspaper reported Monday...

...In early June, six people were killed and up to 50 were injured after some 200 thugs were hired to beat up farmers in a village in Hebei province for refusing to comply with government eviction orders.

Although reports of the unrest have garnered international attention, Chen said many other protests had gone unreported.

"There are at least three million villages across the country and you can imagine how many problems crop up each day," he told the paper.


Philippine Daily Inquirer: Growing rural unrest in China a sign of democracy

Honoring Heroes on Independence Day


Picture credit: http://fightingfourth.com
Fallen HeroesToday is the day that we celebrate our independence. With all of its foibles and with all its backbiting, caterwauling critics, there is no question but that the United States of America is the greatest force for good that the planet Earth has ever seen.

Photo
Remembering Fallen Heroes

How can I prove that contention?

Here's an easy test: what country struggles to control its immigration -- legal and illegal -- more than any other? I think you can guess the answer. Yes, it's the U.S. Here's a Google search for "USA immigration." It yields about five and a half million results and numerous advertisements, which are all designed to address a question that interests people the world over: how do I immigrate to the United States? 

In fact, I decided to do a quick test using Google. I searched for "country name  immigration" and tallied the number of results for each country. The results are in the accompanying table. Certain countries have search terms qualified to omit irrelevant results (e.g., Jordan to remove references to "Barbara Jordan"; all such special cases are noted below with the specific hyperlinks):

United States29,900,000   Sweden1,230,000
Canada8,150,000   Iran1,280,000
UK5,470,000   Egypt1,220,000
Mexico4,940,000   Vietnam1,180,000
France4,870,000   Indonesia1,160,000
China4,700,000   Norway1,110,000
Australia4,370,000   Thailand1,070,000
Japan3,800,000   Argentina997,000
Germany3,830,000   Taiwan943,000
India3,370,000   Denmark938,000
Israel2,810,000   North Korea933,000
Russia2,540,000   Cuba885,000
Italy2,520,000   Jordan878,000
Spain2,300,000   Saudi Arabia860,000
New Zealand1,720,000   Libya812,000
Pakistan1,470,000   Syria790,000
South Africa1,440,000   Yemen772,000
Turkey1,390,000   Sudan767,000
Brazil1,320,000   Kuwait730,000
Poland1,290,000   Iceland720,000
Switzerland1,280,000   Cambodia686,000
Belgium1,250,000   South Korea658,000


This, I think, is indicative of how many people are trying to get into the United States. And I think it's safe to say which country -- by a huge margin -- is most desirable.

In remembrance of Independence Day and the heroes who are fighting and dying to preserve our freedom, I ask you to consider a donation to the Fallen Heroes Last Wish Foundation:

The objective of this foundation is to grant the last wish of the U.S. servicemembers who have been lost in Operation Iraqi Freedom: to provide for their children.


Donations are tax-deductible and can be made via PayPal. Dan O'Dowd of Green Hills Software is matching every dollar with two of his own (up to $200,000). So each dollar you donate is multiplied by three automatically.

Other worthy causes include FreedomCalls, which provides technology supporting communications between soldiers serving in Afghanistan and Iraq and their families, and Soldiers' Angels, a support group for American service members stationed around the world. No matter the specific organization, a donation to any of these worthy causes benefit the soldiers and families who have sacrificed so much for us. What have we done to deserve such heroes?

Make a donation

More Noteworthy July 4 posts:

Captain's Quarters: A Fourth for Remembrance
Clarity and Resolve: Now More than Ever
Froggy Ruminations: Words of Wisdom
Michelle Malkin: Rove-ing Reports
Outside the Beltway: Critics Call Radio Hosts’ Trip Propaganda Mission
Wizbang: What if We hadn't Invaded Iraq?

Chủ Nhật, 3 tháng 7, 2005

Training for Improved Stamina


Picture credit: Scandinavian Boxing Rankings
Excel web sharing - spreadsheet collaboration over the Internet made easy with BadBlueThe man many observers believe is the finest pound-for-pound boxer in the world -- Floyd Mayweather, Junior -- was on HBO last night. The broadcast was a repeat of last Saturday's pay-per-view event from Atlantic City, in which Mayweather opposed veteran Arturo Gatti.

I hesitate to call it a fight, though. A demolition, perhaps. Utter domination, certainly. The still-undefeated Mayweather exercised a hand- and foot-speed advantage seldom seen at this level of competition. After three rounds, Mayweather looked like he was hardly breaking a sweat, while Gatti was sucking down water, struggling to stay in the bout. After six rounds, Gatti's corner threw in the towel.

The punch-stat totals were as one-sided as you can imagine. Mayweather connected on 57% of his punches, compared to a measly 17% for Gatti: 168 to 41. The numbers were even more skewed for power shots: 115 to 10. It is hard to imagine a more thorough annihilation of a proven, experienced boxer by a younger man.

Why was Mayweather so fast and in such obviously superior condition?

Announcer Don Merchant let slip an interesting anecdote. During training, Mayweather eschewed the traditional three-minute rounds followed by one minute breaks. He frequently sparred in ten-minute rounds, with a new, fresh sparring partner for each.

In some cases, Mayweather took ten or fifteen seconds off between rounds, rather than sixty seconds. Combination work came in ten-minute segments and each continuous heavy-bag training session is fifteen minutes long, with no breaks.

The formula is really quite simple. Training sessions that require such enormous energy expenditures make the actual bout itself a walk in the park.

The lessons of Roy Jones, Junior

Another interesting training tidbit relates to former pound-for-pound great, Roy Jones, Jr. Jones was trained by his father, who reportedly pushed his son into greatness through a training regimen that would have felled most human beings. Among his unique training approaches: one-handed sparring.

Supposedly, a series of sparring partners would be brought in to face Roy, Jr. One at a time, they would box a round with the son, who was permitted to use only one hand during each round. The hand he was permitted to use varied from right to left based upon round: even round numbers got the left, odd rounds got the right. Not only that, but the sparring partners were, say, sixteen years-old while Roy, Jr. was twelve or thirteen. Talk about a rough indoctrination.

Hard Training

While great genetics is a primary determinant in the development of world-class athletes, another lesson is equally clear. The best athletes have generally trained harder, smarter and faster than their opposition. Michael Jordan's brutal pickup games and Mia Hamm's outrageous regimen helped build the foundation for improved confidence and mental intensity. And, if you want to be a world-class athlete, it probably doesn't hurt to have a father willing to push you to the limit.

Thứ Bảy, 2 tháng 7, 2005

Carnival of Trackbacks


Picture credit: http://www.parl.ns.ca
Excel web sharing - spreadsheet collaboration over the Internet made easy with BadBlueI'm in, baby... with a vengeance! Wizbang's carnival of trackbacks is in full swing. In celebration, here are some of my personal favorite trackbacks:

  • Regarding Iraqi Ties To September 11th 2001 from SoCalPundit

  • The Modern Slave Trade as mentioned by the Cassandra Page

  • Ending Identity Theft from Stuart Berman

  • What really happened in Deadwood? from Holy Shmoly

  • Offbeat technical interview questions as linked by XTremeBlog


  • And a bonus double-reverse trackback:

    Froggy Ruminations: Crying Wolf

    Thứ Sáu, 1 tháng 7, 2005

    Eviscerating the New York Times... again


    Picture credit: http://www.time.com
    WarThe blogger voted (by me) as the most likely to get a syndicated column is New Sisyphus. Actually, it's unclear whether the blog is written by a group or a single person. Either way, it's not to be missed. In a recent entry, NS brutalizes a New York Times' op-ed piece. The editorial's unnamed, gasbag authors are left holding a shredded canard - but not any semblance of an argument.

    The combination of this piece and a panoply of excellent commentary on Powerline make for powerful, maddening reading. That the leadership of the Democratic party can so willfully ignore their own votes, which clearly stated the rationale for war in Iraq ("Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States... are known to be in Iraq... Whereas Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and safety of United States citizens...") -- and that they can do so without any fear that the mainstream media will sound the alarm claxons for egregious duplicity -- are among the more obvious reasons for the blogosphere's ascendancy in audience, importance and quality of analysis.

    We did not expect Mr. Bush would apologize for the misinformation that helped lead us into this war, or for the catastrophic mistakes his team made in running the military operation. But we had hoped he would resist the temptation to raise the bloody flag of 9/11 over and over again to justify a war in a country that had nothing whatsoever to do with the terrorist attacks. We had hoped that he would seize the moment to tell the nation how he will define victory, and to give Americans a specific sense of how he intends to reach that goal - beyond repeating the same wishful scenario that he has been describing since the invasion.

    -- Excerpt, New York Times, Lead Editorial, today


    Liberals, as the whole world knows, are masters of nuance and of complex thinking. It is Conservatives who deal in simplistic ideals... responding to detailed challenges by issuing jingoistic clichés. Bush... is roundly ridiculed in the MSM and the Leftish corners of the Internet for his lack of nuance, his lack of comprehension...

    ...So why is it that liberals persist in claiming to not understand the President’s central argument regarding the War on Terror, the Iraq War’s place in that larger conflict and the role of 9.11 in shaping his strategic worldview that made Iraq a necessary battlefield?

    ...The President’s argument is easy to grasp... The attacks of 9.11 were not simply terrorist attacks — as the attacks on our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania as well as the U.S.S Cole were perceived and treated — but a declaration of war. This declaration of war was readily identifiable as such by the vast majority of the American people, yet carried with it a new and perplexing wrinkle.

    The enemy was not a nation-state or even the agents of a nation-state, but, instead, the vanguard of a wide-spread ideological movement... ...This new enemy shares a common cause not bounded by nationality or a specific grievance, but by an essentially fascist view that only the [ideologues]... are truly human, that [only they] have a holy duty to decide who lives and who dies, that only [their beliefs] are acceptable, and that the unbelievers must be converted by force or be killed so that a return to some romanticized volkish past... in all of [its] historical homelands (this includes you, Spain), can be achieved.

    Thus, after 9.11 the nation found itself at war with an organized ideological enemy. While most of this enemy were non-state actors, some received sanctuary and support from some states, notably the Taliban-ruled Afghanistan and the Islamic Republic of Iran...

    However, at its core, the enemy was not a state or even a collection of states, but an ideology... The central lesson of 9.11 taken away by the President was that if these... “root causes” of terror were not addressed... it would be only a matter of time before the United States was attacked again. And the next attack may well be many times worse, given the state of modern weapons technology and our free and open society.

    Here the President made a judgment as the chief exective, commander-in-chief and the man actually responsible not only for our safety but the safety of future Americans as well. In his judgment, the [enemy's] ideology... rose to prominence... for the same reason the same affliction rose among a good proportion of the world’s Germans a half-century ago: a sick and afflicted political culture has nurtured a violent popular ideology of grievance-fixation, anti-Semitism and murder. Nothing short of breaking the back of the conditions that gave rise to the ideology of fascism would deprive it of strength and recruits, thereby preventing future attacks on the U.S. from a foe that is neither deterrable nor destructible in the classic sense.

    That being the case, once the immediate and relatively easy to identify goal of removing an obvious state sponsor of... Fascism was accomplished in Afghanistan, the President needed to put his strategic vision into action.

    A number of reasons made... Baathist Iraq the obvious choice: it was a once-prosperous, multi-ethnic community in the heart of the Islamic world that had been brutalized by an insanely aggressive regime that not only had invaded neighboring countries twice but had used long-banned chemical weapons in doing so. It also had an on-going program to further develop WMD for its use. It had used WMD against its own population to strengthen its rule by fear. It was still technically at war with the United States, violating a cease-fire almost daily by firing upon American pilots. It had attempted to assassinate an ex-President of the United States. It was supporting suicide bombing in Israel by providing financial benefit to such fanatic’s families. It had given refuge to terrorist groups and terrorist leaders. In short, Iraq was the poster child for the type of dysfunctional political culture that had given rise to the grievance-based ideology...

    Thus, Iraq presented the President with a convergence of strategic sense and tactical opportunity. Strategic, in that a conversion of Iraq to a more democratic and prosperous country would provide a counter-model to that proposed by the [ideologues]; tactical in that its WMD program, aggressive behavior and... links to terrorist groups represented a threat to the United States.

    ...Together, both prongs, along with the aggressive use of law enforcement domestically and abroad, diplomacy, and special operations in remote theatres, make up the wider War on Terror...

    ...it is in 9.11 that the President forged his central judgment: that a phenomenon previously thought to be a regrettable but constant in life—Islamic terrorism—has now shown itself ready, willing and able to represent an existential threat to the United States and that, therefore, it must be fought aggressively, while on the offensive, in a wide-ranging campaign to deny it sanctuary, succor and room for growth.

    Thus, for the NY Times and liberals at large to say that Iraq had “nothing whatsoever to do with the terrorist attacks,” is to miss the larger point the President is making... Iraq is central to the President’s war aims in that he seeks to inject a radical new order in the heart of the Middle East, one that will present an alternative and democratic space [to] deflate the appeal of the fascism that gave rise to 9.11 and similar attacks.

    For liberals to pretend not to understand all this — for them to lose their vaunted sense of nuance and understanding — reveals a profound and distasteful dishonesty on their part... Beyond indicting Bin Laden in District Court for the Southern District of New York, liberals have been without a strategic plan on how to win the War on Terror. In fact, they would deny such a war even exists.

    Such is their right. But their standard-bearer, Senator Kerry, took that argument to the American people a mere 7 months ago and they soundly rejected it in favor of the strategic vision advanced by President Bush and his team...

    Clearly, it’s Bush who has a problem with complex arguments and nuance and not, say, the editorial board of the New York Times.


    New Sisyphus: Eviscerating the New York Times... again