Same party that continually feeds the Constitution into a shredder suddenly worried about two representatives voting before taking oath

Does it get any more hypocritical than the miscreant known as Anthony's Wiener?

Yesterday, Reps. Pete Sessions (R-TX) and Mike Fitzpatrick (R-PA) failed to take the oath of office on the House floor along with the other 433 members of Congress which caused the GOP caucus to scurry, worrying that some of the congressional actions Sessions and Fitzpatrick took yesterday may not have been valid. This morning, the House passed a resolution to fix this problem by a vote of 257-159 — with 27 Democrats voting in favor, three House members voting “present” (including Sessions and Fitzpatrick), and 16 others not voting. The resolution invalidated any votes Sessions and Fitzpatrick had taken yesterday, but also said that “all other actions the members took would count as if the two representatives were sworn in on the floor.”

After the resolution was introduced, Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) took to the House floor to criticize the new Majority for violating its own newly-instituted parliamentary rules. “A new section was created…that required at least three days notice to consider legislation,” he said, adding, “It is particularly important in this case since we’re dealing with a constitutional issue, one that is without precedent.”

Gee, but I thought the Constitution was an anachronism?

Or over 100 years old, which means no one can understand it?

The New York Times has even attempted to paint the Constitution as "irrelevant".

So why would the progressives care whether the oath was taken a few minutes after the vote?

After all, it's a living and breathing document. It means whatever they want it to mean. Because they routinely mock and disregard the Constitution.

It's what they do. It's who they are.